SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROVES THAT DECOMPRESSION WORKS
Orthopaedic Technology Review (2003; 6 (5))
Surgical Alternatives: Spinal Decompression
CONCLUSION: 86% of the 219 patients who completed the therapy reported immediate resolution of symptoms, while 84% remained pain-free 90 days post-treatment. Physical examination findings showed improvement in 92% of the 219 patients, and remained intact in 89% of these patients 90 days after treatment. It was shown to be effective for herniated and degenerative discs.
Journal of Neurologic Research (Vol. 29, No. 3, March 2003)
US Musculoskeletal Review 2007
American Journal of Pain Management (Vol. 7, No.2, April 1997)
DECOMPRESSION THERAPY HAS LASTING RESULTS
Anaesthesiology News, (Vol. 29, No. 3, March 2003)
Vertebral Axial Decompression Reduces Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain-4 Year Study.
CONCLUSION: Four year follow-up after Decompression method shows a sustained 86% reduction in pain and that 91% of patients had resumed their normal activities and has remained pain free.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine February 2008
MEASURED SUCCESS EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPINAL DECOMPRESSION THERAPY
BY BURKHART T,1 BLUMKE Z, 2 DALEY K, 3 SORENSEN L , 4 HUNT T5
MORE THAN 31 MILLION AMERICANS EXPERIENCE LOW BACK PAIN at any given time and 80 percent of the population will experience this problem in their lifetime (Forer, 2012). But the surgical option for treating low-back pain often has postoperative complications (Street et al., 2011).
There is now a nonsurgical approach that uses various treatments such as spinal decompression therapy. In a recent study (Gionis and Groteke, 2012), researchers found that 86 percent of patients completing decompression therapy reported resolution of their symptoms. This article details a recent outcome study (Blumke, 2014) completed by a Davenport University health information management intern at a chiropractic centre in West Michigan providing spinal decompression treatment. The treatment program described as follows was found to be highly successful with little to no post-treatment complications.
DECOMPRESSION THERAPY EVALUATION TREATMENT PROTOCOLS SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In health information management programs, students participate in real life activities associated with a healthcare organization to apply their acquired knowledge. In this case, the student project included documentation review, data collection, and analysis. Under the supervision of a doctor of chiropractic, the intern was given access to patient records dating from 2011 to 2014.
To track satisfactory rates for the spinal decompression treatment provided in the facility, the electronic health records of 163 randomly chosen patients were examined to record date of treatments, gender, chief complaint, and diagnosis. A section for comments was included from each patient to record medical history, nature of the onset, exacerbating factors, and pain indices throughout the treatment plan.
The demographic profile of the patients evaluated was fairly uniform, with a slight majority of women (54 percent) over men (46 percent). The chief complaint listed revealed that over 50 percent of the sample reported some sort of lower back pain. The remainder of complaints comprised such conditions as neck, shoulder, hip, leg, and foot pain.
The clinical evaluation showed a success rate of slightly more than 90 percent, with success defined as patients being “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the outcome of their treatment. Of the 163 patient charts examined, only 14 patients were classified as “not satisfied” or having deemed the therapy unsuccessful. Four of those patients discontinued their care to seek alternative treatment; namely, a surgical option in an attempt to minimalise pain that was not responding to nonsurgical spinal decompression.
The majority of the patients reported looking forward to receiving care because of the positive results of their treatment, and many were able to avoid surgery. After treatment, patients reported feeling better with minimal pain and overall felt optimistic. The results of this evaluation exceed the expected outcomes. Statistical evidence shows that throughout the U.S., more than 75 percent of patients are satisfied with the end result of their care (Blumke, 2014). In this evaluation, 91 percent of patients who complained of pain in their back or neck were pleased with their nonsurgical spinal decompression outcome.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS:
1 TIMOTHY BURKHART, DC, BCIM, partner in Burkhart & Chapp Chiropractic PLC in Grand Rapids, Mich.
2 ZACHARY BLUMKE, Health InformationManagement student, Davenport University in Grand Rapids,Mich.
3 KAREN DALEY, PhD, RN, dean, College of Health Professions, Davenport University in Grand Rapids,Mich.
4 LINDA SORENSEN,MPA, RHIA, CHPS, chair, Health Information Management Department, Davenport University in Grand Rapids,Mich.
5 THOMAS HUNT,MBA, RHIA, CHTS-IM, PhD, associate dean, Health Information Management Department, Davenport University in Grand Rapids,Mich.
Aimbire F, et al. Low-level laser therapy induces dose-dependent reduction of TNFalpha levels in acute inflammation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006;24(1):33-7.
Beattie PF, Nelson RM, Michener LA, Cammarata J, Donley J. Outcomes after a prone lumbar traction protocol for patients with activity-limiting low back pain: a prospective case series study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(2):269-74.
Bjordal JM, Couppé C, Chow RT, Tunér J, Ljunggren EA. A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Aust J Physiother. 2003:49(2):107-16.
Blumke Z. (2014). “How Successful is Chiropractic Care?” Paper submitted to meet the requirements of Davenport University Practicumfor HINT 297C.
Botnick AJ. “Why I Quit Chiropractic.” Chirobase. http://www.chirobase.org/03Edu/botnick.html. Revised August 6, 2013. Accessed Feb 2, 2015.
Forbush SW, Cox T, Wilson E. Treatment of patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy using a multimodal conservative approach in a geriatric population: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(10):723-33.
Forer, B. “Neck Pain: Chiropractors, Exercise Better Than Medication, Study Says.” ABC News. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/01/04/neck-pain-chiropractors-exercisebetter-than-medication-study-says. Published January 4, 2012. Accessed February 2, 2015.
Gionis TA, Groteke E. (2012). “Spinal decompression: The outcome of a clinical study.” [Blog post]. Pro-Care Medical Center. http://www.procaremedcenter.com/surgicalalternatives-spinal-decompression. Published
May 18, 2010. Accessed Feb 2, 2015.
Gose EE, Naguszewski WK, Naguszewski RK. Vertebral axial decompression therapy for pain associated with herniated or degenerated discs or facet syndrome: an outcome study. Neurol Res. 1998;20(3):186-90.
Guehring T, et al. Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(15):1658-665.
Hall H. “Top 10 Chiropractic Studies of 2013.” Science-Based Medicine. http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/top-10-chiropractic-studiesof-2013. Published January 21, 2014. Accessed February 2, 2015.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “Article for Chiropractic Services – Supplemental Instructions Article (A47385).” CMS.gov. http://apps.ngsmedicare.com/SIA/ARTICLE_A47385.htm. Published November 1, 2008. Updated April 1, 2010. Accessed Feb 2, 2015.
Keeney BJ, et al. Early predictors of lumbar spine surgery after occupational back injury: results from a prospective study of workers in Washington State. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(11):953-64.
Nelson BW, et al. Can spinal surgery be prevented by aggressive strengthening exercises? A prospective study of cervical and lumbar patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(1):20-25.
Odell R, et al. Decompression Reduces Chronic Back Pain: 4 Year Study. Anesthesiology News. 2003;29(3):14-15.
Street JT, et al. Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J.2012;12(1):22-34.